Movie Reviews & More

New Joker Images from The Dark Knight

Were these leaked? Probably. It makes me a little sad to look at them, but I can’t hide my excitement either. I don’t want to have to wait until December to see something big.

~Edit – You can also view them at John Bierley’s Flickr page if Warner Bros starts taking them down from either site.


Spiderman 3 (2007)

Spiderman 3Four Stars

Who’s in it

Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, Thomas Hayden Church, Topher Grace, Bryce Dallas Howard, James Franco, J.K. Simmons

Should you see this movie?

Maybe. That is what I will cautiously say. Right before I left, I read a couple reviews for the movie, with the critics being so-so on it. Most of the reviews said it was campy, and there was too much crying. Not phased by reviews usually, we went, and I will say that as a fan I was so out of my mind excited for the treatments for the villains. However, I thought the movie totally sucked through the middle and was completely campy, especially through that point, and, yes there was too much crying. That is the short review, now to pick it apart as the fan boy.

I knew going in, that the movie seemed to have a little much going on. Somehow the movie was going to accomplish these things;

  • Continue the conflict between Peter Parker and Harry Osborn, where somehow Harry was going to be turning into a super villain
  • Peter was going to try to ask Mary Jane to marry him
  • Flint Marko was going to be established as the real killer of Peter’s Uncle Ben as well as turned into the Sandman
  • Introduce Gwen Stacy, as a character and then a competitive love interest
  • Introduce the symbiote suit from outerspace, what it does to Peter, and how he gets rid of it
  • Introduce Eddie Brock, establish him as a character and then give him motivation to hate Spiderman
  • Introduce Venom as a character
  • Keep all of the small sub threads going simultaneously

Wow! What a lot of stuff. From what I read, the direction Sam Raimi was writing the new script with Sandman as the villain, and possibly someone else when Avi Arad came to him and told him he wasn’t listening to the fans, that the fans want to see Venom. I thought the plot made sense, and it flowed together fine, not like it was an afterthought. But I do think when you cover so much ground, lots of things get left on the table.

The first half of the movie is highly segmented. There is a short scene showing Harry Osborn stepping out of the chamber with the green smoke, and although you get that he is strong now and probably didn’t need to go into detail, it felt so quick and unnerving a little bit. It started to remind me of latter Bat-man’s, where the creation of a villain was whimsical, like there were no consequences for the villain themselves or those around them. They were just there to destroy the hero.

We did see the introduction of the symbiote. It comes down in a meteor from outerspace, and crawls onto Peter’s bike. I don’t mind that they needed to update this a little. Someone Peter needs to get it, and I don’t know what the best answer was here, but didn’t think it crawling onto Peter’s bike was the best solution. The Symbiote is attracted to aggression, there was none at the time, so you can’t even justify that as the reason it would crawl to the moped.

The scene above the city with Peter fighting Harry, you’ve seen it in the previews, but that doesn’t matter. Awesome! They did an awesome job, just like the rest of the action in the movie. High intensity, never before seen stunts, it will keep you mesmerized. For me, Harry Osborn’s treatment as a villain was logical. I never liked the Green Goblin treatment, so for this I put the comic geek in me aside and didn’t care about the Hobgoblin and his story. If Harry was to create a villainous identity, one on a hoverboard with a retractable mirrored mask makes sense.

There is a scene with an out of control crane on top of a building, that swings a beam into another building destroying a whole floor. Pretty cool idea, gives way for Spiderman to save Gwen Stacy. I loved the action of the falling pieces of the building and Spiderman dodging through them. I did notice Sam’s treatment of the falling debris as being his trademark, and a little weird. I also thought the CG on the exploding glass looked a little strange too.

Then, to continue the story, it gets into Peter’s room, and in one stormy night where Peter has strong aggressive feelings, it attaches itself to his costume. This didn’t bother me as much since now it was in the room. But, immediately they cut to Peter hanging from a building, talking to himself about the suit. Again, segmented, jarring, and stupid. Why don’t they explain this? Too much going on, and too little time of course. Or so I thought.

This is getting long, I’ll try to make these points shorter. The Sandman is created. The sign on the fence Flint Marko jumps says something to the effect, “Stay Out Text Particle Facility”. Seriously? They couldn’t have done that someway else? I also though the CG treatment of Marko initially after the accident didn’t look that great, looked kind of generic, and didn’t fit with the rest of the CG later in the movie. But no big deal.

The introduction scene of Marko as the Sandman, nice job, solid and interesting. The fighting scene between Spiderman and Sandman in the sewer – Awesome! The fact that Sandman can just particalize and float through the whole city on the wind, majorly stupid. I don’t care if this was comic book related or not, it seemed like an easy solution to how he would get through the city so quick, and it was a bad one.

Then comes the middle of the film. Raimi tries to establish that Peter is a bad guy now, talking back to people, doing things he may have thought of doing before, but didn’t have the guys. Talking back, treating people poorly, dressing in black and wearing a Good Charlotte Emo haircut. I get that the general audience doesn’t understand the suit, and you have to show the power it has, but seriously, snapping your fingers down the street and looking coyly at women. The singing and dancing in the bar? Was all of it necessary? I think you cut this section way down, and flesh out the other disjointed sections just a little more. The section of the movie was just as bad for me as sitting through the whole fourth Batman, I just cringed in my seat.

However, the scene with Peter fighting Harry as a badass, and throwing a bomb back at his face, very cool. Keep the action, this was the strong suit of the whole movie. All of it was top notch.

Finally, he hits Mary Jane, and we see, oh, the suit is bad for him. And, the movie hits a turning point, and sans all the cry baby crap in the end, the movie is the best of any of the any movie’s from here on out.

We see Peter get rid of the suit in an awesome CG scene, and Eddie Brock become Venom. The part where Venom meets Sandman and is crawling on the wall looks a little weird, but that is the only part. The news clips of Venom are frightening, and Eddie Brock’s face transformation, and the suit pulling back just looked amazing. I will say I had my reservations of a younger, thinned Brock. But it makes a lot of sense as “the evil Peter Parker”. Similar build, just didn’t have the moral core to handle power like Peter did. It is a more logical transition that having Eddie Brock be a middle aged body builder like he is in the comic. And, Topher Grace put on some 20 plus pounds for the part and whether or not they beefed him up in CG in the suit, or if it was all him, he was a good size I thought without being too crazy huge.

The whole end sequence. Amazing, Amazing, Amazing. Possibly the most amazing thing I have ever seen. How the did Venom, he was as scary as he should be, and acted just as he should. Loved the hanging taxi in the black webbing over the city, the enormity of the webbing was just fantastic.

The accumulation of the plot between Harry and Peter comes to a head here, and the general feel good audience member liked that Peter and Harry team up to fight the end two villains. Kind of sappy probably for a real comic geek, but something I liked to see, for the sequences if nothing else.

Sandman here in the end, you get to see why he is no two bit part villain. He is truly fearsome, and here in the end we are all glad there are two villains kicking the crap out of Peter. You can’t imagine Peter fighting The Sandman only as the final to the movie, and you can’t imagine him fighting Venom and Sandman without Harry’s help. To watch Sandman rise up over the city as this huge monster was just amazing, and to watch Harry throw bombs at him and turn him into glass, and then shatter pieces of him was really awesome too. How else do you really stop a man made of sand?

Venom, Venom, Venom. Loved it. They did an awesome scene in getting Brock out of the suit by banging hollow tubs on the ground, then sticking them into the cement in a ring around the symbiote. This whole section gave me goosebumps. The symbiote separates itself, but not before you see many a scene of Venom turning his head and screeching like a monster from hell. For writing this character in towards the end, they just couldn’t have done a better job.

Then the end, Brock is blown up with the symbiote, Harry dies saving Peter, and Sandman, cries and floats away on the wind. The crying by everyone, a little much, but probably needed for a main screen movie for the general public. It was the least of my worries in the parts I hated for this movie.

So, a terribly long review. But a lot to say. As you can see, for the geek in me, sometimes you have to sit through crap to see the good stuff, and the second half of the movie made all of the middle bad stuff worth it. As a comic fan, you have to see this movie! But you have to turn off the super geek and try to enjoy the big idea. The small plots and accuracies will tear you apart if you don’t. The general public, that is hard for me to say, and that is why I say maybe. I think you will be taken for a ride in the CG. Venom might scare you to the point of non-enjoyment, but I think for something so out there you have never seen before, you will get that satisfaction from this movie. It is also a nice close to the three movies if they were a trilogy, so I think for some of those plots, and especially the close to Peter’s relationship with Harry.

I think you should go see it, just know you will see it because you are invested in the story for the others, you want great special effects, but parts of it, you won’t like.


Illusionist (2006)

IllusionistFour Stars

Who’s in it

Edward Norton, Jessica Biel, Paul Giamatti, Rufus Sewell

Should you see this movie?

Yes. Sarah thought this movie was predictable, and me being the usual “enjoyer I don’t think too much” at movies didn’t see anything happening before it did, therefore I was surprised. A story about a man that creates amazing illusions, kind of like magic but much more, and the woman he loves. They are childhood lovers but are separated by class, but are reunited later in their lives in different circumstances. The acting here is solid, nothing to win an Oscar for, but you really watch this for the ideas and the suspended belief in the truth of whether something is possible. I think most people may like this, unless you are trying to predict how it will end like Sarah, then pass on this. But truly a different and interesting movie set in an interesting period and place.


Match Point (2005)

Match PointTwo Stars

Who’s in it

Jonathan Rhys Meyers, Scarlett Johansson, Brian Cox

Should you see this movie?

No, skip it. I don’t know too much about Woody Allen as a director, and I shouldn’t have expected any less of this movie from the previews, but this movie is depressing, you hate the main character, and the story spirals out of control to the worst end possible. Meyers is this creepy, charming, driven young man who takes it all from the rich lifestyle, but has an affair with his brother in law’s ex fiancee. After she gets pregnant a chilling set of events happen that he miraculous survives, but has to live with the guilt. I watched the clock the whole time during this movie, and although Scarlett is good in the movie, attractive, the previews make it looks a little different. The subject matter isn’t something I would recommend to most, but you insist on seeing it for Scarlett, she is the only redeeming qualilty of the movie, unless you like twisted stories about affairs.


Invincible (2006)

InvincibleFour and a Half Stars

Who’s in it

Mark Wahlberg, Greg Kinnear, Elizabeth Banks

Should you see this movie?

I enjoyed this movie a lot, and I think most people would regardless of whether they like football or not. It’s about a local guy in Philadelphia who gets the chance for an open tryout with the Eagles and against all odds, makes the team. But is a solid feel good movie from Disney, and it was said best when it was said this is “The Rookie” movie but for football. It would have been perfect except for this short bizarre slow motion mud football scene that really does nothing for me and was really distracting. But seriously, see this, Wahlberg is so fat it’s amazing.


Ultra Violet (2006)

Ultra VioletOne and a Half Stars

Who’s in it

Milla Jovovich, Cameron Bright, William Fitchner

Should you see this movie?

Milla is pretty to look at in her cool, tight fitting, colorful outfits, and this movie had some cool techie visualizations of what this future world may look like, but overall, it was a POS movie. The acting was horrendous, the action so outrageously unbelieveable, and the plot so simple but yet got so mixed up that you can’t believe you are only 50 minutes in when it seems like hours. Milla is one of a small race of dying people and an extremeist trying to protect her breed, similar to a vampire. She ends up protecting a young boy with her life, who is the cure. But why she feels so strongly, who knows, and how many more roles can this creepy little kid with the blank stare portray. They are all the same, and I am tired of the both of them.


The Punisher (2004)

The PunisherThree and a Half Stars

Who’s in it

Thomas Jane, John Travolta, Will Patton, Rebecca Romijn, Ben Foster

Should you see this movie?

This movie is good, but mostly for me because it is a lot like the comic book. Unless you like intense violence, I would skip this movie, there are some disturbing things that happen, like a scalded face, piercings ripped out, etc. But I like to watch movies that bring my comics to life and I thought Jane is a great cast for Frank Castle. Castle’s whole family is slaughtered by an evil man, and you feel his loss. The whole movie centers around revenge, but has some humor to it, and it is amazing how great of shape Castle is in, makes you feel really slobby. So, yeah, want to see people die and feel like a slob, see this movie. If you like comics though, this is a great rendition and you should check it out.